← Year 8 Chemistry

How can you tell a reaction happened?

You can't see atoms rearrange, but you can see the signs: a colour change, a gas given off, a solid forming in a liquid, light, a smell, or a temperature change. Each is a clue that a new substance formed, not proof: boiling water bubbles too. The test is still a new substance.

Bake a cake and it rises, browns and smells wonderful. Leave a nail outside and it turns orange. In each case, how do you know something new was made?

Last lesson: a chemical change makes a new substance. This lesson: how to spot one without seeing the atoms.

WidthMore contexts, same idea.
EngageCommit to a prediction before you test anything. A wrong guess is fine: it shows you what to look for.

Engage: fizz or no fizz

Which of these shows a chemical change has happened for certain?

ExploreTry it on the board and compare what happens with your prediction.

Explore: signs on the board

Try it yourselfNothing is saved: start again as often as you like.

Burn the methane. Note the temperature at the start and the end.

Use the board. This ticks when you get there.

Now dissolve some salt. Any new kinds of particle?

Use the board. This ticks when you get there.

ExplainUse the particle model to explain what you saw.

Explain: signs and the test

In your book: list five signs of a chemical change. Next to each, give one example where the sign appears without a chemical change, if you can.

Is it a sign of a chemical change?

A colour change when two substances mix
Bubbles of a new gas
A solid forming when two clear liquids mix (a precipitate)
Light or heat given out, or the mixture getting colder
A new smell
The substance changing shape

Chemical change, or a sign that misleads?

A cake browning in the oven
Vinegar and bicarb fizzing
Water boiling and bubbling
Blue and yellow paint mixing to green
A nail rusting orange
A hot drink cooling down

When magnesium burns there is a bright light, and a white powder is left. Which is the strongest evidence of a chemical change?

Why does each sign suggest a new substance has formed?

A colour change
Bubbles of gas
A precipitate
Heat or light given out, or getting colder
A new smell

Elaborate TypicalUse the same idea in a new context.

Elaborate: melting gives signs too

Try it yourselfNothing is saved: start again as often as you like.

Heat the water from ice to steam.

Use the board. This ticks when you get there.

As the water boils, it bubbles. Why isn't this a chemical change?

Elaborate WiderUse the same idea in a new context.

Elaborate: a precipitate

Two clear solutions are mixed and the liquid goes cloudy with a fine yellow solid that settles. What does this suggest, and how could you check?

EvaluateLook back at your first ideas and what changed.

Evaluate: look back

Write one sentence: "At first I thought… Now I think… because…"

Revision summary

For teachers

Students list observable signs of chemical change and explain that each is a clue to a new substance, not proof, distinguishing misleading signs in physical changes (AC9S8U07, node 3). About 22 minutes.

Open the teacher guide: answers, solutions, slides and a worksheet.

Students will be able to

Before class

A concept tutorial for introducing or revising the idea; it is best paired with a circus of quick reactions (vinegar and bicarb, lead-free precipitates, steel wool burning). Set the width with ?width=minimum, typical (default) or wider. It follows Is it a new substance? (node 2) and comes before Hotter or colder? (nodes 4 and 5).

Not a hinge node. Students tend to treat any one sign as proof; the prediction and the "clue or trap" sort target it.

Board notes: the board can't show colour, smell or a precipitate; it shows new particles and the temperature change. The dissolve board shows a case with no sign at all.

Running the lesson

  1. Engage: tally the predictions. Any single sign chosen means 'sign = proof'.
  2. Explore: ask which observation from the burning board would also happen without a reaction.
  3. Explain: the two sorts are the success criteria.
  4. In your own words: five signs, each with a misleading example where possible.

The hard part (on purpose)

Holding 'clue' and 'test' apart. When a student says 'it bubbled, so it reacted', ask what is inside the bubbles before agreeing.

When students get stuck

Stretch and support

Stretch: Why is 'it can't be reversed' a poor test for a chemical change? (Some physical changes are hard to reverse, like shattering a glass; some reactions can be reversed, like charging a battery.)

Support: Give the signs as picture cards (bubbles, colour, cloudy solid, flame, thermometer, nose) to sort into 'sign' and 'proof needed'.

Where it leads

Next: Hotter or colder? (exothermic and endothermic, nodes 4 and 5). Comparing physical and chemical changes with all the criteria (node 6) is a class task.

In class: a reaction circus with an observation table (what you saw, which sign, new substance?).

What each step is for

Now you can
Next lesson9. Hotter or colder?Some reactions give out energy to their surroundings, so the surroundings get hotter: they are exothermic (burning, respiration, hand warmers). Others take in energy, so the surroundings get colder: they are endothermic (instant ice packs, photosynthesis, cooking).